Noah Thurner vs Liam Hignett Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 18 Oct at 09:10 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Thurner vs L. Hignett

 GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win

 GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Thurner 1 - 0 Hignett
They have played 2 sets in total, with Noah Thurner winning 2 and Liam Hignett winning 0. The last match between Noah Thurner and Liam Hignett was at the M25 Sarreguemines, 19-10-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Carpet, with Noah Thurner getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Thurner | 1 | 
| Hignett | 0 | 
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) M25 Sarreguemines(10-19-25)
N. Thurner vs L. Hignett H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 | 
| 44.44% (104-130) | Career Total W/L | 35.21% (25-46) | 
| 1 | Indoor | 0 | 
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 | 
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) | 
N. Thurner vs L. Hignett Match Preview:
- When comparing recent second serve performance, Noah Thurner has a win rate of 43.15% versus Liam Hignett's 44.57%. A slight edge for Hignett?
 - Looking at return game stats, Hignett excels by winning 45.11% of opponents' second serve points, marginally higher than Thurner's 43.58%.
 - On first serve returns, Hignett's effectiveness at 27.07% surpasses Thurner's 25.17%, indicating a stronger return ability.
 - When under pressure, Hignett saves 57.01% of breakpoints compared to Thurner's 55.43%. Is Hignett more clutch?
 - Thurner holds a slight advantage in match win percentage over the last year with 51.61% compared to Hignett's 43.75%.
 - Surface preferences show Thurner performing best on Hard at 45%, while Hignett has his best success on Indoor Hard at the same 45% rate.
 - Both players are familiar with Futures tournaments, but Thurner has faced opponents with a higher average rank, 279.39 versus Hignett's 213.88. Does this make Thurner more battle-tested?
 - In deciding sets, Thurner has a 23% win rate, while Hignett has struggled, winning 0%. If it goes the distance, will Thurner capitalize?
 - Event-specific performance can alter predictions, so reviewing current event stats is crucial for an informed decision.
 
Editorial Prediction (October 18, 2025, UTC):
Noah Thurner and Liam Hignett present a close match-up, with both possessing specific strengths that could influence the outcome. Thurner's slight edge in overall match wins and deciding-set performance suggests a stronger resilience under pressure. He may also benefit from facing tougher opponents historically, which could make him more adaptable in this contest.
Conversely, Hignett appears to have a slight upper hand in return statistics and break point saves, key elements in disrupting Thurner's momentum. The match could be determined by how effectively Hignett can capitalize on return opportunities and maintain this advantage.
Considering these factors, and especially Thurner's proven ability to handle high-pressure scenarios, he is marginally favored to win this upcoming match against Hignett.
Noah Thurner vs Liam Hignett Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Thurner vs L. Hignett H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 | 
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 | 
| 12 | Games Won | 7 | 
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 6 | 
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 6 | 
| 1:32:48 | Average Match Time | 1:32:48 | 
| 66% (40/61) | 1st Serve % | 56% (40/72) | 
| 80% (32/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 78% (31/40) | 
| 43% (9/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 31% (10/32) | 
| 43% (3/7) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (1/3) | 
| 43% (31/72) | Return Points Win % | 33% (20/61) | 
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) | 
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) | 
Recent Performance Stats
N. Thurner Recent Matches Played
L. Hignett Recent Matches Played

N. Thurner vs L. Hignett Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 44.44% (104/130) | YTD Win/Loss | 35.21% (25/46) | 
| 46.67% (238/272) | Sets Win/Loss | 39.13% (63/98) | 
| 48.70% (2420/2549) | Games Win/Loss | 46.30% (750/870) | 
| 45.07% (32/39) | Hard Win/Loss | 34.48% (10/19) | 
| 43.75% (56/72) | Clay Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) | 
| 45.71% (16/19) | Indoor Hard W/L | 38.24% (13/21) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 28.57% (2/5) | 
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.34 | 
| 320 | Aces Total | 272 | 
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 | 
| 459 | Total Double Faults | 170 | 
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:21:49 | 
| 229.85 | Average Opponent Rank | 189.17 | 
| 67% (4642/6886) | 1st Serve % | 59% (2304/3925) | 
| 66% (3067/4642) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (1543/2304) | 
| 44% (989/2244) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (783/1621) | 
| 43% (257/604) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (119/303) | 
| 38% (2585/6766) | Return Points Win % | 36% (1422/3926) | 
| 44.44% (104/130) | Futures W/L | 35.21% (25/46) | 
| 45% (104/232) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 35% (25/71) | 
| 48% (33/69) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (10/19) | 
| 32% (14/44) | Deciding Set Win % | 32% (6/19) | 
| 83% (117/97) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 72% (29/21) | 
| 17% (117/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 28% (29/8) | 
| 6% (117/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (42/4) |